Nincompoop Harry now a feral threat to royal family
The reason why Prince Charles and Prince William felt compelled to put some distance between they and runaway royal Prince Harry was that they are terrified about what he will pass onto his wife, Meghan Duchess of Sussex.
Ardent believers in the Green Revolution the three, Charles, William and Harry, share an ideology as well as blood. So how did it come to this? The answer is that Harry upon his marriage to Meghan bought deeply into the new victim culture.
His conversion into the victim culture led him into race and thus into the one movement, the most sensitive of all, that the royal family by its own behaviour had up to that moment avoided becoming embroiled in.
At their pomp and circumstance wedding the royal family was convinced that the marriage would ensure that they stayed clear of it for ever.
In the event it was the wedding that saw the royals irrevocably stained by it. Far from being insurance against race smearing, Meghan instead plunged the royal family head first into it.
By now in full victimhood Harry and Meghan held forth before Oprah in their famous double act blending the two, race and victimhood, into a televisual cocktail.
Since the start of the last century the royal family has primarily been in the business of caring, and being seen to care. This purpose was exemplified by Her Majesty the Queen Mother during World War 2, notably in her refusal to let the royals flee the blitzed London. Diana was another natural exponent in her devotion to off-beat causes such as AIDS and land mines.
Charles found a broad gauge caring outlet in matters of the environment most controversially in architecture before establishing himself as a green revolutionary, and he encouraged his two sons to follow him down this planetary saving path, which they did.
But at no stage did any member of the royal family establish themselves as a cause which is exactly what happened when in the tripartite Oprah show Meghan and Harry declared themselves as personifying race and victimhood.
These are the twin horses of the contemporary cultural apocalypse and it was for fear of further feeding these horses that Charles and William were compelled to avoid one-on-ones with their errant brother and son.
They knew that Meghan would pump her hapless husband for the finer details of the exchange and after that what? Another session with Oprah?
Much of today’s mass culture is still composed on screen and print of families coping with the unexpected and often the result of some terrible accident or the impact of something outside the familial control.
Harry’s segue into Hollywood was unexpected, but manageable. His dramatic entry before a global audience into full membership of the outrage industry was unexpected and unmanageable. Unexpected because his family had imagined that there would be a publicity armistice while his grandfather the Duke of Edinburgh lay on his deathbed.
The fact that the duo went ahead anyway with their victim statement shook the royal family if only by its timing.
Amid the British upper class and upper middle class there has been since the 1960s a reverse snobbery in which the privileged seek to portray themselves as hard done-by. Prince Charles is an example here with his references to his Spartan years at the progressive Gordonstoun school. Actually, his contemporaries point out, the pupils were far removed from the rigours that the prince describes.
We can go back further than this to Harry’s great uncle Edward V111 of Abdication fame who deliberately modified his tones into a near Cockney.
Tony Blair a product of a school even more rarified than Gordonstoun is said to have abraded his accent so that it chimed with his political career.
The syndrome in which those with a comfortable way of life seek to identify with those enduring less fortunate backgrounds is the cause of our times. It becomes supercharged when it takes to the streets giving vent to the cherished class belief that the privileged are responsible for the plight of the less privileged.
Nobody expected Harry to take to the streets on this one. He turned up instead on the broadcasting channels.
Until the “step back” from his royal duties Harry was regarded as a nincompoop though a well-intentioned one. He is now in a new guise which is that of a feral creature who if aroused will with his partner turn on his family wreaking further vengeance.
In establishing themselves as professional victims Harry and Meghan have introduced the equivalent of several new university degree courses in such fields as sociology and media studies and at a pinch in constitutional studies too.
Little-known foreign formula is nation’s policy backbone
United Nations Agenda 30 is the political blueprint for New Zealand. It is the operational master plan for the much better known climate change programme and its multitude of associated ideological objectives
According to the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research the poorest households are likely to be disproportionately hurt by climate change regulations with the poorest 40 percent enduring six times the harm of the richest 20 percent..
Agenda 30 has the unquestioning support of the Labour Government and its satellite parliamentary Green Party. They view the agenda as the overriding passport to winning elections.
The same report by the long-established Institute of Economic Research considers the aggressive targeting of the nation’s agricultural sector will cause production to shift overseas and with no subsequent impact on global emissions.
The general public is unaware of Agenda 30 and its stern implications for New Zealand because the nation’s mainstream media zealously approves of any and all United Nations doctrines.
Agenda 30 was propounded by United Nations as a consolidation of its climate change campaign and with the intention of binding in countries such as New Zealand known to have an intellectual class particularly prone to ideology.
After a succession of episodes in places such as Rwanda and the Balkans in which United Nations was responsible for immense loss of life due to its inability to implement its promise to use military intervention to save them, the UN knew it had to find another reason to exist.
This was the beginning of its climate strategy and all the contrived crises and extinctions that have been its hallmarks and all duly propagated by a complicit media. This in spite of the UN even after being told by Taiwan of the imminent Covid epidemic, an authentic crisis, failed to do anything about the genuine version until it was too late.
Agenda 30 is the ticking political booby trap of our epoch. If anyone challenges it and seeks to dismantle it they get blown up. This is why the National Party opposition from time to time applies a delicate stethoscope to it. But that is all. Similarly with the ACT Party which also refuse to challenge the foreign doctrine being imposed on New Zealand and at such cost.
The National Party and ACT understand the ferocity in their upper income urban electorates of the intelligentsia response should they demean climatism as an article of faith.
New Zealand is considered to contribute somewhere between 0.02 and 0.17 of greenhouse gases. Yet New Zealand is used by United Nations as the showcase for its Agenda 30 which uses climate change ideology as its nosecone.
Economists point out that the government’s crash scheme to force the population into electric cars will most harm the poorer people who cannot afford them.
The success of United Nations in imposing Agenda 30 on New Zealand is that throughout the actual, the real crises of recent years, notably the homeless emergency and Covid 19 that the UN has succeeded in keeping Agenda 30 at the head of the to-do list and the overriding priority here.
This is the reason for routine government proclamations about the climate “emergency” and doing so when there have been seismic indications of another real potential emergency. But earthquakes for example are not a current preoccupation of activists under the spell of United Nations. .
The success of United Nations in inspiring unquestioning faith is so evident now in the absence of anyone daring to ask about its role in Myanmar. Burma as Myanmar is now known was an early member country of United Nations.
United Nations is often described as a vast bureaucracy and those involved with it will cheerfully go along with this admitting to privileged lifestyles and generous travelling allowances. They know though that in its new field of high profile ethical posturing it is ruthlessly efficient.
United Nations embedded intelligence channels are often far more effective than those of its nation state members. These networks allow it to accurately gauge the mood of these member countries in going along with its Agenda 30.
It knows that in its fervent adherence to Agenda 30 the New Zealand government can safely order the switching off for example of the nation’s natural gas which is one of the chief resources behind its economy.
Contrived self-harming the UN knows will be outweighed by the ability of activists to portray it in heroic terms, and as a tiny sacrifice to be endured in exchange for the approval of United Nations.
As a bureaucracy the United Nations own priority is to remain one, a bigger one, and this allows it to behave in a sovereign manner. When the government announced the end of oil exploration and did so to a university student gathering the power of United Nations to implement Agenda 30 via this sovereign influence takes on a tangible form.
.When it bailed out of effective peacekeeping United Nations turned to the environment and did so with a strategy designed to convey the impression that nothing much was done to save it before the UN arrived on the scene. This was wildly successful in New Zealand, in spite of its existing and much promoted clean green branding.