Management School Techniques are camouflaged under exhibitionist Barbarity

The common sense in merging New Zealand’s dual main national security agencies, Communications and the Security Intelligence Service has been more than proved during the intervening months. The reason is that the terror problem since then has been clearly demonstrated to be more unstructured than anyone, notably security specialists, had dared to believe.

The burden of evidence now points to individuals being under the direction of a corporate style client-management process with the manager-controller issuing instructions via the messaging services, writes our European Correspondent.

The client management process in which terror perpetrators are assigned one single controller with overriding access to their ground force is straight out of management schools. This is hardly surprising bearing in mind that so many members of the terror directorate attended Western management schools.

These controllers acquire their asset, the ground force inside the country to be attacked, via another long proven consumer sales technique, that of combing through respondents to their advertising, which in their case takes an ideological form on the internet.

All this is shrouded by distorting techniques chief of which is their deliberately high profile exhibitionist barbarity. The underlying strategic purpose here is to sow fear and uncertainty among their opponents, especially their fellow Arabs.

These displays have permitted terror outfits to defeat in the field much larger and better equipped government forces whose members with the current and vividly portrayed level of barbarity in mind have simply cut and run.

Similarly their gruesome displays conveniently camouflage their business school approach which, for examples, relies on corporate-style marketing divisions that include music studios for the formulation of jihadi-jingles, and on line publishing operations. This vertical integration and divisional control remains slickly disguised under the barbarian camouflage which Westerners interpret as an exhibition of ignorance.

The terror outfits know that for so many in the West ignorance is bliss. That accordingly awareness is low if it exists at all of these advertising and marketing support operations in the form of media centres, which in turn are supported by language units, and video distribution logistics nodes .

Faith in profiling was another Western security misconception that the terror controllers took every advantage of.

Operationally, the ground asset, the individual would be instructed to purge themselves of their profile model. The assassin-to -be would be instructed to embark upon, for example, a serious and visible round of clubbing and boozing to wash away their pious aura. This consistently threw security agencies off their track.

Similarly with the most pervasive of all which is the all young male stereotype. Females up to middle age are now demonstrably proven to become lethally fanaticised.

The poverty criterion is the hardest Western stereotype to wash away. It remains a component. But only a component. This remains the most indelible of profile-type stereotypes. It survived 9/11 in which all the operatives came from rich backgrounds of the type that enabled them in the first place to live and travel and in some luxury in the United States.

In the management school approach of the terror movement has been the perception and understanding of these levels of vulnerability.

Notably here is the great applied philosophical drift over the last 50 years in the West broadly known as multiculturalism in which those of differing ways of life and beliefs and from other countries have been encouraged in their manifest diversity, even if it became threatening.

It was this doctrinal belief that for example fatally stalled the reaction of the socialist French government mired down as it was, and to some extent still is, by its immense leftward wing which gave and still gives the appearance of giving more priority to doctrine than to national security.

It is this constant and unseen probing of the West’s weak points in the form of its stereotypes, misconceptions and pre-conceptions that poses the greatest threat to a country such as New Zealand.

New Zealand’s “it can’t happen here” attitude will have been carefully noted. By someone. Somewhere.

From the MSCNewsWire reporters' desk - Tuesday 27 September 2016